Italian Citizenship

Venice Court Recognizes Action for Italian Citizenship by Iure Sanguinis

The Venice Court admits the action and declares jurisdiction to process the recognition request of Italian citizenship iure sanguinis (case 18059/2026). Practical impact for residents abroad.

Venice Court Recognizes Action for Italian Citizenship by Iure Sanguinis
Foto: Helena Jankovičová Kováčová (Pexels)

Venice Court Recognizes Action for Italian Citizenship by Iure Sanguinis

CATEGORIA: cidadania

CONTEÚDO (Markdown): The Venice Civil Court admitted the action for recognition of cittadinanza italiana iure sanguinis and declared itself competent to process the request in judgment no. 18059/2026, published on 02/10/2026, according to the decision text published by Diritto Pratico. The Court acknowledged the applicants' interest in pursuing judicial recognition and kept the case open despite the absence of opposition from the resisting party.

Summary of the decision

  • Judgment no. 18059/2026 of the Tribunale Civile di Venezia, published on 02/10/2026 (source: Diritto Pratico — https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenze.html?c=https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenza/tribunale/venezia/2026/18059.html#1dfe6).
  • The Court concluded that the applicants have an interest and standing to file the judicial action for recognition of Italian citizenship iure sanguinis and affirmed its jurisdiction to hear the request.
  • The petition was filed by the parents on behalf of their minor daughter (identity not reproduced in the excerpt available) — descendants have an ascendant who was born in the Province of Venice. The Public Prosecutor viewed the case file without filing conclusions, and the resisting party was declared in default (did not contest).

Relevant legal grounds

  • The judge grounded the decision on the principle that the issue of citizenship can be a contested matter, allowing a judicial route when there is objective uncertainty about the right, with reference to art. 100 c.p.c. as the basis for handling issues of competence (the Court outlined the contentious nature of the proceeding).

    "Art. 100 c.p.c." (reference to the provision regulating competence and contentious matters).

  • It was emphasized that, as a rule, the judicial route is applicable when there is uncertainty or administrative omission — but recent legislative changes must be observed: after the Tajani Decree (DL 36/2025 converted into L. 74/2025) and Decree 36/2025, the administrative landscape has shifted significantly (see Observations section below).
  • To determine territorial competence, the Court applied the rule introduced by Legge 206/2021, in force since 22/06/2022, which provides — for applicants residing abroad — competence to the Court linked to the municipality of birth of the Italian ancestor or, where applicable, to the Sezione specialized in immigration and citizenship. The judgment interprets this provision as authorizing direct filing of the action at the Tribunale di Venezia when the ancestor was born within its jurisdiction.
  • What changes in practice for Brazilian families

    • For Brazilian descendants whose Italian ancestor was born within the jurisdiction of the Tribunale di Venezia, the decision confirms that it is possible to directly sue in Venice even when residing abroad, in accordance with the territorial rule in force since 22/06/2022.
    • Important: since 2025 there have been significant legislative changes that restrict administrative avenues and alter the scope of the right to iure sanguinis citizenship. In particular:
      • The comune, in most cases, is no longer a valid route for autonomous administrative recognition of jure sanguinis requests (Decree 36/2025).
      • The consular route was restricted by the Tajani Decree (DL 36/2025 / L. 74/2025) and is currently limited to children and grandchildren of Italians; great-grandchildren and later generations no longer have consular administrative access for recognition.
      • The Tajani Decree introduced retroactive effects on material law in many cases, declaring that certain people born abroad who are not children or grandchildren of an Italian may not have been Italian at birth. This retroactive character must be considered in each case.
    • Therefore, the judicial route remains possible and may be the only effective path for some applicants, but each strategy must be evaluated based on the applicant's generation and the impact of the Tajani Decree on the substantive right.
    • The judgment reinforces that, in the face of uncertainty or relevant administrative omission, the judicial route may be invoked, but it does not replace an assessment of the impact of 2025 norms on the applicant's substantive right.

    Timelines and recommended actions

    • Check whether an administrative attempt has already been made and whether this route is applicable to your case: the consular administrative route today is relevant only for children and grandchildren; the comune, in most cases, has ceased to autonomously recognize jure sanguinis requests after the 2025 changes. Record any denials or evidence of delay when relevant.
    • Gather full certificates (birth, marriage, death) for the entire family line and documentation proving the no naturalization of the ancestor up to the relevant date.
    • Consider hiring an Italian attorney specialized in citizenship and immigration; they can assess whether the administrative route still applies (restricted to children/grandchildren) or if the judicial route is more appropriate, and advise on territorial competence according to legge 206/2021.
    • Arrange sworn translations and any consular apostille as required for Italian proceedings to avoid delays due to insufficient documentation.

    For practical guidance on documents and steps, consult /cidadania and similar cases at /vida-na-italia.

    Limits and observations

    • The decision of the Tribunale di Venezia fundamentally concerns competence and the right of access to the judiciary; it does not replace the need to prove, case by case, the filiation and the ancestor's citizenship status.
    • The text of the available sentence does not contain a full citation of the Tajani Decree (DL 36/2025 converted into L. 74/2025); it is crucial to note that this decree has a restrictive character and retroactive effects on material rights in many cases. The retroactivity of Tajani Decree refers to material rights (affecting, in legislative terms, the condition of those who were “never Italian” if not a child or grandchild), and should not be treated merely as a procedural issue. This distinction requires careful verification and specialized legal counsel.
    • Proceedings filed before the Tajani Decree comes into force are protected by the decree's own text; this protection differs from the retroactivity issue affecting material rights.
    • Each judicial action will depend on the evidence produced and any state involvement; this decision does not automatically grant citizenship recognition in all cases, but confirms the possibility of filing the action in the indicated forum.
    • Primary source of the sentence publication: Diritto Pratico — https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenze.html?c=https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenza/tribunale/venezia/2026/18059.html#1dfe6 (access to the decision text).

    Conclusion: Judgment no. 18059/2026 of the Tribunale di Venezia reaffirms that the judiciary can be invoked by descendants residing abroad when there is uncertainty or administrative omission, and confirms the competence of the court linked to the birthplace of the Italian ancestor; however, due to restrictions introduced in 2025 (Decreto Tajani / DL 36/2025 converted into L. 74/2025 and Decree 36/2025), close attention must be paid to the effect of these norms on the administrative route and on the applicant's substantive right. The success of each action remains conditioned on concrete documentary evidence and the governing substantive rules.

    End of document

    Read next