Tribunale di Venezia Accepts Request for Citizenship iure sanguinis
A Venice Court ruling (09/22/2026) recognizes Italian citizenship by descent; decision explains territorial jurisdiction and practical effects for residents abroad.

Meta description: A Venice Court ruling (09/22/2026) recognizes Italian citizenship by descent; decision explains territorial jurisdiction and practical effects for residents abroad.
The judgment n. 17537/2026 of the Tribunale Civile di Venezia, published on 09/22/2026, recognized the cittadinanza italiana iure sanguinis for descendants of an ancestor born on 11/05/1861. According to the decision text published by Diritto Pratico, the Public Prosecutor's Office gave visto senza opporsi to the acceptance of the claim; the respondent did not appear and was declared contumace, and the court granted the request for recognition filed by the plaintiffs. Source: Diritto Pratico — https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenze.html?c=https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenza/tribunale/venezia/2026/17537.html#c2e9e
Summary of the decision
The n. 17537/2026 judgment ruled in favor of recognizing Italian citizenship by descent (iure sanguinis) for applicants whose ancestor was born on 11/05/1861. The proceeding is pending at the Tribunale Civile di Venezia and the decision was published on 09/22/2026, according to the decision text published by Diritto Pratico. The Public Prosecutor expressed visto senza opporsi to the request, while the responding authority (the respondent) did not appear and was declared contumace. The court concluded there was a procedural interest and territorial competence, ordering the recognition of the sought citizenship.
The full decision is available in the sentence repository consulted: Diritto Pratico — https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenze.html?c=https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenza/tribunale/venezia/2026/17537.html#c2e9e
Why the Tribunale di Venezia was competent
The court grounded its competence on the provision introduced by the legge n. 206/2021, which changed the rules on territorial competence for citizenship recognition actions when applicants reside abroad.
Law 206/2021 provides, among other things, adjustments to territorial competence in status recognition proceedings when the interested party lives outside Italy.
Since 06/22/2022, for applicants living outside Italy, competence may relate to the comune of birth of the Italian father, mother, or grandfather. In the case heard in Venice, the ancestor was born in a province that assigns competence to the Tribunale di Venezia, which is why the court considered itself competent to adjudicate the action. The court also reiterated that, although the right to citizenship by descent is permanent and imprescriptible, the judicial path remains viable when there is administrative uncertainty or omission by the competent authorities, making a judicial action for recognition legitimate.
What this decision means in practice for Brazilian families
- It confirms that descendants of Italians residing in Brazil can seek judicial recognition of citizenship when the administrative route does not yield effective results or is ineffective.
- It reinforces that for applicants domiciled abroad, the action may be filed in the court corresponding to the comune of birth of the Italian ancestor, under the competence rules amended by Law 206/2021. This criterion facilitates forum selection when the ancestor's comune points to a specific Tribunale, as in this case Venice.
- In practical terms, the court notes that there is no prescription for recognizing citizenship status by descent; however, the judicial route is advised when there is denial, omission, or uncertainty in administrative or consular action.
For those researching the topic, Raízes Italianas already publishes guides and news on recognition processes: see our section on Cittadinanza Italiana and updates in Notícias da Itália.
Documents and evidence cited / procedure
In the case judged, the petitioners submitted birth and marriage certificates and argued that the capostipite never naturalized as Brazilian, a central argument to demonstrate transmission of citizenship by blood (iure sanguinis). The court evaluated the evidence on the absence of naturalization of the ancestor as an essential element for recognition. The judge also examined the active legitimacy of parents and representatives acting on behalf of minors (potestà genitoriale) and found the presented evidence sufficient to grant the claim.
It is recommended, in similar cases, to gather and file, whenever possible:
- birth and marriage certificates of the ancestor and successors;
- death certificates where applicable;
- documents proving the non-naturalization of the forebear in the country of residence;
- sworn translations and apostilles/consularizations as needed.
For practical guidance on documentation, consult the pages of the dedicated portal on Cittadinanza Italiana and experiences of those who have gone through judicial processes.
Impacts and practical guidance for future requests
The Tribunale di Venezia ruling constitutes a relevant local precedent: it shows that Italian courts continue to recognize citizenship-by-descent requests in contentious actions when administrative channels are not effective. This reinforces the importance of verifying, before filing, the comune of birth of the ancestor, since Law 206/2021 may assign competence to different courts depending on this criterion. Important: the Venice decision does not mention the so-called "Decreto Tajani / L. 74/2025"; therefore, its effects should not be attributed to the case unless directly referenced in the judgment. Careful reading of the judicial text is essential to understand the scope and limits of the ruling.
For practical topics on living and working with dual citizenship in Italy, also see our Vida na Itália.
Conclusion The Tribunale di Venezia n. 17537/2026 confirms that the judicial route remains viable and effective for recognizing Italian citizenship by descent when there are clear evidentiary elements and administrative circumstances do not permit extrajudicial recognition. The case highlights the relevance of Law 206/2021 for defining territorial jurisdiction in actions involving applicants residing abroad and serves as a reference for Brazilian descendants evaluating a judicial recognition action. Source of the decision: Diritto Pratico — https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenze.html?c=https://apps.dirittopratico.it/sentenza/tribunale/venezia/2026/17537.html#c2e9e.





